- Home
- Compare Phones
- ACE Buzz Neo 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro
ACE Buzz Neo 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.
ACE Buzz Neo 5G
Price coming soon

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Even
Faster charging
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro
Higher-resolution camera
Even
Better display
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro
Lighter body
Even
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | ACE Buzz Neo 5G | Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Panel Type | — | AMOLED |
| Resolution Height | — | 2340 |
| Resolution Width | — | 1080 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 | 120 |
| PPI | — | 385 |
| Glass Type | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Screen-to-body | — | 86.8 |
Platform
| Spec | ACE Buzz Neo 5G | Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | — | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | — | Adreno 710 |
| Chipset Name | Unisoc T760 | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Process (nm) | — | 4 |
| OS Name | — | Android |
| UI Skin | — | One UI 8.5 |
| OS Version | — | 16 |
Memory
| Spec | ACE Buzz Neo 5G | Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| cardslot | — | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| unknown | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Variants | — | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | ACE Buzz Neo 5G | Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Video | — | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Features | — | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Count | — | 3 |
| Macro | — | 2 MP, (macro) |
| ultrawide | — | 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Wide | — | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide) |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | ACE Buzz Neo 5G | Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Video | — | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Features | — | HDR |
| Count | — | 1 |
| Lens | — | 12 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
Battery
| Spec | ACE Buzz Neo 5G | Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | — | 6000 |
| Wired Charging (W) | 18 | 45 |
Body
| Spec | ACE Buzz Neo 5G | Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Build | — | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), plastic frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+) |
| SIM | — | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Height (mm) | — | 162.4 |
| Thickness (mm) | — | 8.1 |
| unknown | — | IP64 dust tight and water resistant (water splashes) Drop resistant up to 2m |
| Weight (g) | — | 206 |
| Width (mm) | — | 78.2 |
Launch
| Spec | ACE Buzz Neo 5G | Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | — | 2026, August 03 |
| Status | — | Coming soon. Exp. release 2026, August 08 |
Network
| Spec | ACE Buzz Neo 5G | Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 2gbands | — | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 |
| 3gbands | — | HSDPA 850, 900, 1700(AWS), 1900, 2100 |
| 4gbands | — | LTE |
| 5gbands | — | SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA, LTE, 5G | GSM, HSPA, LTE, 5G |
Connectivity
| Spec | ACE Buzz Neo 5G | Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | — | 5.1 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| Positioning | — | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | — | Unspecified |
| USB Type | — | Type-C |
| USB Version | — | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
Sound
| Spec | ACE Buzz Neo 5G | Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 3 5mmjack | — | No |
| Loudspeaker | — | Yes |
Features
| Spec | ACE Buzz Neo 5G | Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | — | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| unknown | — | Virtual proximity sensing |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both ACE Buzz Neo 5G and Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Other popular comparisons

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi


Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple