Cubot Tab KingKong S vs Panasonic Toughpad FZ-A1
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.
Cubot Tab KingKong S
Price coming soon
Panasonic Toughpad FZ-A1
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Cubot Tab KingKong S
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Cubot Tab KingKong S
Better display
Cubot Tab KingKong S
Lighter body
Cubot Tab KingKong S
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Cubot Tab KingKong S | Panasonic Toughpad FZ-A1 |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Panel Type | IPS LCD | LCD |
| Resolution Height | 1280 | 1024 |
| Resolution Width | 800 | 768 |
| Refresh Rate | 90 | — |
| PPI | 149 | 127 |
| Glass Type | Mohs level 6 | — |
| Screen-to-body | 73 | 55.5 |
Platform
| Spec | Cubot Tab KingKong S | Panasonic Toughpad FZ-A1 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Dual-core 1.2 GHz Marvell |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | — |
| Chipset Name | Unisoc Tiger T616 | — |
| Process (nm) | 12 | — |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 15 | 3.2 |
Memory
| Spec | Cubot Tab KingKong S | Panasonic Toughpad FZ-A1 |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Variants | 256GB 6GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | Cubot Tab KingKong S | Panasonic Toughpad FZ-A1 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 48 MP | 5 MP |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | Cubot Tab KingKong S | Panasonic Toughpad FZ-A1 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | Yes | — |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 16 MP | 2 MP |
Battery
| Spec | Cubot Tab KingKong S | Panasonic Toughpad FZ-A1 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 15300 | 4590 |
| talk time | — | Up to 10 h |
| Wired Charging (W) | 33 | — |
Body
| Spec | Cubot Tab KingKong S | Panasonic Toughpad FZ-A1 |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | No |
| Height (mm) | 246.4 | 266.7 |
| Thickness (mm) | 15.6 | 17.8 |
| Weight (g) | 912 | 952.5 |
| Width (mm) | 164.4 | 213.4 |
Launch
| Spec | Cubot Tab KingKong S | Panasonic Toughpad FZ-A1 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September | 2011, October. Released 2012, Q4 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Cubot Tab KingKong S | Panasonic Toughpad FZ-A1 |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 | N/A |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, 900, 1700(AWS), 1900, 2100 | — |
| 4G Bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | — |
| edge | — | No |
| gprs | — | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | — |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA, LTE | No cellular connectivity |
Connectivity
| Spec | Cubot Tab KingKong S | Panasonic Toughpad FZ-A1 |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5 | 2.1 |
| NFC | No | — |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB Type | Type-C | — |
| USB Version | — | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Cubot Tab KingKong S | Panasonic Toughpad FZ-A1 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Cubot Tab KingKong S | Panasonic Toughpad FZ-A1 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, compass |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Cubot Tab KingKong S and Panasonic Toughpad FZ-A1 are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Cubot Tab KingKong S packs a 15300 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Cubot Tab KingKong S reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 48 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple