Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite vs Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.
Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite
Price coming soon
Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2
Better display
Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2
Lighter body
Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 5 | 5 |
| Panel Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution Height | 854 | 1280 |
| Resolution Width | 480 | 720 |
| PPI | 196 | 294 |
| Screen-to-body | 66 | 65.3 |
Platform
| Spec | Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.2 GHz | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| GPU | Mali-400 | Mali-400MP2 |
| Chipset Name | Spreadtrum SC7731 | Mediatek MT6582 |
| Process (nm) | — | 28 |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 4.4 | 4.4.2 |
Memory
| Spec | Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Variants | 8GB 0.5GB RAM | 8GB 1GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 5 MP | 13 MP |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 2 MP | 5 MP |
Battery
| Spec | Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 2100 | 2000 |
| Chemistry | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| stand by | Up to 250 h | Up to 300 h |
| talk time | Up to 12 h | Up to 8 h |
Body
| Spec | Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM/ Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM) |
| Height (mm) | 143 | 145 |
| Thickness (mm) | 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Weight (g) | 145 | 150 |
| Width (mm) | 73 | 72.8 |
Launch
| Spec | Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2015, October. Released 2015, November | 2014, June. Released 2014, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 2100 | HSDPA 900, 2100 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA | GSM, HSPA |
Connectivity
| Spec | Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1 | 4 |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite and Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Gigabyte GSmart Classic Lite packs a 2100 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Gigabyte GSmart Mika M2 reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 13 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple