itel City 100 vs itel Zeno 200
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.
itel City 100
Price coming soon
2category wins
itel Zeno 200
Price coming soon
1category wins
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
itel City 100
Faster charging
itel City 100
Higher-resolution camera
Even
Better display
itel Zeno 200
Lighter body
Even
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | itel City 100 | itel Zeno 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 6.75 | 6.75 |
| Panel Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution Height | 1600 | 1600 |
| Resolution Width | 720 | 720 |
| Refresh Rate | 90 | 120 |
| Peak Brightness | 700 | — |
| PPI | 260 | 260 |
| Screen-to-body | 84.6 | — |
Platform
| Spec | itel City 100 | itel Zeno 200 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Chipset Name | Unisoc T7250 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Process (nm) | 12 | 12 |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 14 | 15 |
Benchmarks
Geekbench (Single-Core)
Geekbench (Multi-Core)
AnTuTu
| Spec | itel City 100 | itel Zeno 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench (Single-Core) | 437 | 437 |
| Geekbench (Multi-Core) | 1,461 | 1,461 |
| AnTuTu | 308,467 | 308,467 |
Memory
| Spec | itel City 100 | itel Zeno 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Other | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Variants | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | itel City 100 | itel Zeno 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 13 MP | 13 MP |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | itel City 100 | itel Zeno 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 8 MP | 5 MP |
Battery
| Spec | itel City 100 | itel Zeno 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 5200 | 5000 |
| Wired Charging (W) | 18 | 15 |
Body
| Spec | itel City 100 | itel Zeno 200 |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Height (mm) | 167.7 | — |
| Thickness (mm) | 7.7 | — |
| Other | — | IP65 dust tight and water resistant (low pressure water jets) MIL-STD-810H compliant* * does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions Drop resistant up to 1.8m |
| Weight (g) | 185 | 185 |
| Width (mm) | 77.5 | — |
Launch
| Spec | itel City 100 | itel Zeno 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 27 | 2026, September |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 27 | Available. Released 2026, September |
Network
| Spec | itel City 100 | itel Zeno 200 |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, 900, 2100 | HSDPA 850, 900, 2100 |
| 4G Bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE |
Connectivity
| Spec | itel City 100 | itel Zeno 200 |
|---|---|---|
| infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB Type | Type-C | Type-C |
| USB Version | — | 2.0 |
Sound
| Spec | itel City 100 | itel Zeno 200 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | itel City 100 | itel Zeno 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Unspecified |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both itel City 100 and itel Zeno 200 are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
itel City 100 packs a 5200 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Other popular comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple