Motorola ATRIX vs Motorola ATRIX TV XT682
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.
Motorola ATRIX
Price coming soon
Motorola ATRIX TV XT682
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Motorola ATRIX
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Motorola ATRIX TV XT682
Better display
Motorola ATRIX
Lighter body
Motorola ATRIX TV XT682
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Motorola ATRIX | Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 4 | 4 |
| Resolution Height | 960 | 854 |
| Resolution Width | 540 | 480 |
| PPI | 275 | 245 |
| Glass Type | Corning Gorilla Glass | — |
| Screen-to-body | 59 | 60.8 |
Platform
| Spec | Motorola ATRIX | Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A9 | 1.0 GHz Cortex-A5 |
| GPU | ULP GeForce | Adreno 200 |
| Chipset Name | Nvidia Tegra 2 AP20H | Qualcomm MSM7227A-AA Snapdragon S1 |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 2.2 | 2.3.7 |
Memory
| Spec | Motorola ATRIX | Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Variants | 16GB 1GB RAM | 1GB 0.5GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | Motorola ATRIX | Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 720p@30fps, 1080p (via SW update) | Yes |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 5 MP | 8 MP |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola ATRIX | Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 1930 | 1700 |
| stand by | Up to 400 h (2G) / Up to 350 h (3G) | Up to 500 h (2G) / Up to 400 h (3G) |
| talk time | Up to 8 h 50 min (2G) / Up to 9 h (3G) | Up to 8 h (2G) / Up to 6 h (3G) |
Body
| Spec | Motorola ATRIX | Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Height (mm) | 117.8 | 119.8 |
| Thickness (mm) | 11 | 9.9 |
| Weight (g) | 135 | 129.7 |
| Width (mm) | 63.5 | 60.5 |
Launch
| Spec | Motorola ATRIX | Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2011, January. Released 2011, April | 2012, May. Released 2012, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Motorola ATRIX | Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, 900, 1900, 2100 | HSDPA 850, 1900, 2100 |
| Speed | HSPA 14.4/2 Mbps | HSPA 7.2/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA | GSM, HSPA |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola ATRIX | Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1 | 3 |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Radio | No | Stereo FM radio, RDS |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Motorola ATRIX | Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Motorola ATRIX | Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 |
|---|---|---|
| browser | HTML, Adobe Flash | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Motorola ATRIX and Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Motorola ATRIX packs a 1930 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 8 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple