Motorola DROID BIONIC XT875 vs Motorola Moto E Dual SIM
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.
Motorola DROID BIONIC XT875
Price coming soon
Motorola Moto E Dual SIM
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Motorola Moto E Dual SIM
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Motorola DROID BIONIC XT875
Better display
Even
Lighter body
Motorola Moto E Dual SIM
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Motorola DROID BIONIC XT875 | Motorola Moto E Dual SIM |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| Panel Type | — | IPS LCD |
| Resolution Height | 960 | 960 |
| Resolution Width | 540 | 540 |
| PPI | 256 | 256 |
| Glass Type | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Screen-to-body | 59.8 | 63 |
Platform
| Spec | Motorola DROID BIONIC XT875 | Motorola Moto E Dual SIM |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A9 | Dual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| GPU | PowerVR SGX540 | Adreno 302 |
| Chipset Name | TI OMAP 4430 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 |
| Process (nm) | — | 28 |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 2.3.4 | 4.4.2 |
Memory
| Spec | Motorola DROID BIONIC XT875 | Motorola Moto E Dual SIM |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot), 16 GB included | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Variants | 16GB 0.5GB RAM | 4GB 1GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | Motorola DROID BIONIC XT875 | Motorola Moto E Dual SIM |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 480p@30fps |
| Features | LED flash | Panorama, HDR |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.4 |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola DROID BIONIC XT875 | Motorola Moto E Dual SIM |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 1735 | 1980 |
| Chemistry | — | Li-Ion |
| stand by | Up to 195 h | — |
| talk time | Up to 10 h 40 min | Up to 24 h (3G) |
Body
| Spec | Motorola DROID BIONIC XT875 | Motorola Moto E Dual SIM |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Height (mm) | 127.5 | 124.8 |
| Thickness (mm) | 11 | 12.3 |
| Weight (g) | 158.8 | 142 |
| Width (mm) | 66.9 | 64.8 |
Launch
| Spec | Motorola DROID BIONIC XT875 | Motorola Moto E Dual SIM |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2011, January. Released 2011, September | 2014, May. Released 2014, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Motorola DROID BIONIC XT875 | Motorola Moto E Dual SIM |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | CDMA 800, 1900 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G Bands | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | HSDPA 2100 - XT1022 |
| 4G Bands | 13 | — |
| Speed | EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps, LTE | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | CDMA, EVDO, LTE | GSM, HSPA |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola DROID BIONIC XT875 | Motorola Moto E Dual SIM |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1 | 4 |
| NFC | — | No |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, RDS |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Motorola DROID BIONIC XT875 | Motorola Moto E Dual SIM |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Motorola DROID BIONIC XT875 | Motorola Moto E Dual SIM |
|---|---|---|
| browser | HTML, Adobe Flash | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Motorola DROID BIONIC XT875 and Motorola Moto E Dual SIM are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Motorola Moto E Dual SIM packs a 1980 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Motorola DROID BIONIC XT875 reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 8 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple