Nokia 3.1 A vs Nokia C02
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.
Nokia 3.1 A
Price coming soon
Nokia C02
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Nokia C02
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Nokia 3.1 A
Better display
Even
Lighter body
Nokia 3.1 A
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Nokia 3.1 A | Nokia C02 |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 5.45 | 5.45 |
| Panel Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution Height | 1440 | 1440 |
| Resolution Width | 720 | 720 |
| PPI | 295 | 295 |
| Screen-to-body | 69.8 | 72.4 |
Platform
| Spec | Nokia 3.1 A | Nokia C02 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 504 | — |
| Chipset Name | Snapdragon 429 | — |
| Process (nm) | 12 | — |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 9.0 | 12 |
Memory
| Spec | Nokia 3.1 A | Nokia C02 |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Variants | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | Nokia 3.1 A | Nokia C02 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 8 MP, f/2 | 5 MP |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | Nokia 3.1 A | Nokia C02 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Features | HDR | — |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 2 MP |
Battery
| Spec | Nokia 3.1 A | Nokia C02 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 2990 | 3000 |
| Chemistry | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wired Charging (W) | 10 | — |
Body
| Spec | Nokia 3.1 A | Nokia C02 |
|---|---|---|
| Build | — | Plastic back, plastic frame |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Height (mm) | 152.7 | 148.7 |
| Thickness (mm) | 9.4 | 10 |
| Weight (g) | 156 | 191 |
| Width (mm) | 71.9 | 71.2 |
Launch
| Spec | Nokia 3.1 A | Nokia C02 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, June. Released 2019, June | 2023, February 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, May |
Network
| Spec | Nokia 3.1 A | Nokia C02 |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, 1700(AWS), 1900 | HSDPA 850, 900, 2100 |
| 4G Bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 14, 29, 30 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE |
Connectivity
| Spec | Nokia 3.1 A | Nokia C02 |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4.2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB Type | Type-C | — |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Nokia 3.1 A | Nokia C02 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Nokia 3.1 A | Nokia C02 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Accelerometer |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Nokia 3.1 A and Nokia C02 are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Nokia C02 packs a 3000 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Nokia 3.1 A reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 8 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple