- Home
- Compare Phones
- Oukitel C58 vs Oukitel C65 Pro
Oukitel C58 vs Oukitel C65 Pro
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.

Oukitel C58
Price coming soon

Oukitel C65 Pro
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Even
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Oukitel C65 Pro
Better display
Oukitel C65 Pro
Lighter body
Oukitel C58
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Oukitel C58 | Oukitel C65 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Panel Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution Height | 1600 | 1600 |
| Resolution Width | 720 | 720 |
| Refresh Rate | — | 90 |
| Peak Brightness | 430 | 430 |
| PPI | 262 | 262 |
| Glass Type | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | CTC Glass |
| Screen-to-body | 83.8 | 83.8 |
Platform
| Spec | Oukitel C58 | Oukitel C65 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Chipset Name | Unisoc T606 | Unisoc T606 |
| Process (nm) | 12 | 12 |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 14 | 15 |
Memory
| Spec | Oukitel C58 | Oukitel C65 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Variants | 128GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | Oukitel C58 | Oukitel C65 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Wide | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide) |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | Oukitel C58 | Oukitel C65 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2, (wide) |
Battery
| Spec | Oukitel C58 | Oukitel C65 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 5150 | 5150 |
| Chemistry | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired Charging (W) | 10 | 10 |
Body
| Spec | Oukitel C58 | Oukitel C65 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | — |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Height (mm) | 166.8 | 166.8 |
| Thickness (mm) | 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Weight (g) | 199 | 201 |
| Width (mm) | 77.5 | 77.5 |
Launch
| Spec | Oukitel C58 | Oukitel C65 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November | 2025, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November | Available. Released 2025, July |
Network
| Spec | Oukitel C58 | Oukitel C65 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, 900, 1700(AWS), 1900, 2100 | HSDPA 850, 900, 1700(AWS), 1900, 2100 |
| 4G Bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE |
Connectivity
| Spec | Oukitel C58 | Oukitel C65 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB Type | Type-C | Type-C |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
Sound
| Spec | Oukitel C58 | Oukitel C65 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Oukitel C58 | Oukitel C65 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Oukitel C58 and Oukitel C65 Pro are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Oukitel C65 Pro reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 50 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi


Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple