Panasonic Eluga C vs Panasonic Eluga Ray 700
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.
Panasonic Eluga C
Price coming soon
Panasonic Eluga Ray 700
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Panasonic Eluga Ray 700
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Even
Better display
Panasonic Eluga Ray 700
Lighter body
Even
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Panasonic Eluga C | Panasonic Eluga Ray 700 |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Panel Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution Height | 1280 | 1920 |
| Resolution Width | 720 | 1080 |
| PPI | 267 | 401 |
| Glass Type | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Screen-to-body | 80.5 | 71.9 |
Platform
| Spec | Panasonic Eluga C | Panasonic Eluga Ray 700 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| GPU | Mali-T860MP2 | Mali-T720MP3 |
| Chipset Name | Mediatek MT6750T | Mediatek MT6753 |
| Process (nm) | 28 | 28 |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 7.0 | 7.0 |
Memory
| Spec | Panasonic Eluga C | Panasonic Eluga Ray 700 |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Variants | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | Panasonic Eluga C | Panasonic Eluga Ray 700 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Count | 2 | 1 |
| Depth | 5 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | — |
| Lens | 13 MP, f/2.2 | 13 MP, f/2 |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | Panasonic Eluga C | Panasonic Eluga Ray 700 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | — | 1080p@30fps |
| Features | — | HDR |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 5 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2 |
Battery
| Spec | Panasonic Eluga C | Panasonic Eluga Ray 700 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 3000 | 5000 |
| Chemistry | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
Body
| Spec | Panasonic Eluga C | Panasonic Eluga Ray 700 |
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | — |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Height (mm) | 141 | 153.8 |
| Thickness (mm) | 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Weight (g) | — | 182 |
| Width (mm) | 73.5 | 75.4 |
Launch
| Spec | Panasonic Eluga C | Panasonic Eluga Ray 700 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2017, November. Released 2017, December | 2017, September. Released 2017, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Panasonic Eluga C | Panasonic Eluga Ray 700 |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, 900, 1900, 2100 | HSDPA 900, 2100 |
| 4G Bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28 | 3, 5, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE |
Connectivity
| Spec | Panasonic Eluga C | Panasonic Eluga Ray 700 |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4 | 4 |
| infrared port | — | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Panasonic Eluga C | Panasonic Eluga Ray 700 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Panasonic Eluga C | Panasonic Eluga Ray 700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Panasonic Eluga C and Panasonic Eluga Ray 700 are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Panasonic Eluga Ray 700 packs a 5000 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Other popular comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple