Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite Duos S6792L vs Samsung Galaxy Rush M830
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.
Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite Duos S6792L
Price coming soon
Samsung Galaxy Rush M830
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Samsung Galaxy Rush M830
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Samsung Galaxy Rush M830
Better display
Even
Lighter body
Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite Duos S6792L
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite Duos S6792L | Samsung Galaxy Rush M830 |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Resolution Height | 480 | 480 |
| Resolution Width | 320 | 320 |
| PPI | 165 | 165 |
| Screen-to-body | 52.3 | 49.5 |
Platform
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite Duos S6792L | Samsung Galaxy Rush M830 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 850 MHz | 1.0 GHz Scorpion |
| GPU | — | Adreno 205 |
| Chipset Name | — | Qualcomm MSM8655 Snapdragon S2 |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 4.1.2 | 4.0.4 |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite Duos S6792L | Samsung Galaxy Rush M830 |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Variants | 4GB | 2GB 0.75GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite Duos S6792L | Samsung Galaxy Rush M830 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 3 MP | 3.15 MP |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite Duos S6792L | Samsung Galaxy Rush M830 |
|---|---|---|
| Count | — | 1 |
| Lens | — | 1.3 MP |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite Duos S6792L | Samsung Galaxy Rush M830 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 1300 | 1750 |
| Chemistry | Li-Ion | — |
| music play | Up to 38 h | — |
| stand by | Up to 280 h (3G) | Up to 348 h |
| talk time | Up to 7 h (3G) | Up to 9 h |
Body
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite Duos S6792L | Samsung Galaxy Rush M830 |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Mini-SIM |
| Height (mm) | 113.2 | 122.9 |
| Thickness (mm) | 11.9 | 11.9 |
| Weight (g) | 118.9 | 119.1 |
| Width (mm) | 61.6 | 59.9 |
Launch
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite Duos S6792L | Samsung Galaxy Rush M830 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2013, October. Released 2013, October | 2012, August. Released 2012, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite Duos S6792L | Samsung Galaxy Rush M830 |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | CDMA 800, 1900 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 900, 2100 | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Speed | HSPA 7.2/0.384 Mbps | EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA | CDMA, EVDO |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite Duos S6792L | Samsung Galaxy Rush M830 |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4 | 4 |
| NFC | No | — |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite Duos S6792L | Samsung Galaxy Rush M830 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite Duos S6792L | Samsung Galaxy Rush M830 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite Duos S6792L and Samsung Galaxy Rush M830 are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Samsung Galaxy Rush M830 packs a 1750 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Samsung Galaxy Rush M830 reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 3.15 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple