Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 vs Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.
Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite S6790
Price coming soon
Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo
Better display
Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo
Lighter body
Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite S6790
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Resolution Height | 480 | 800 |
| Resolution Width | 320 | 480 |
| PPI | 165 | 267 |
| Screen-to-body | 52.3 | 52.9 |
Platform
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 850 MHz | 800 MHz ARM 11 |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 4.1.2 | 2.2 |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Variants | 4GB | 4GB 0.5GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo |
|---|---|---|
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 3 MP | 3.15 MP |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 1300 | 1500 |
| Chemistry | Li-Ion | — |
| music play | Up to 35 h | — |
| stand by | Up to 340 h (3G) | Up to 310 h |
| talk time | Up to 7 h (3G) | Up to 6 h 30 min |
Body
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Micro-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Height (mm) | 113.2 | 115.9 |
| Thickness (mm) | 11.9 | 12.1 |
| Weight (g) | 118.2 | 121.8 |
| Width (mm) | 61.6 | 56.9 |
Launch
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2013, October. Released 2013, October | 2011, March. Released 2011, Q2 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 | CDMA 800, 1900 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 900, 2100 | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Speed | HSPA 7.2/0.384 Mbps | EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA | CDMA, EVDO |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4 | 3 |
| NFC | No | — |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo |
|---|---|---|
| browser | — | HTML |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Samsung Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 and Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo packs a 1500 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Samsung M220L Galaxy Neo reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 3.15 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple