Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 vs Samsung Gravity Q T289
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.
Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310
Price coming soon
Samsung Gravity Q T289
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Even
Better display
Even
Lighter body
Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Gravity Q T289 |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 3 | 3 |
| Resolution Height | 320 | 320 |
| Resolution Width | 240 | 240 |
| PPI | 133 | 133 |
| Screen-to-body | 45.9 | 41.5 |
Platform
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Gravity Q T289 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 850 MHz | 416 MHz |
| OS Name | Android | — |
| OS Version | 4.1.2 | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Gravity Q T289 |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| call records | — | Yes |
| phonebook | — | Yes |
| Variants | 4GB 0.5GB RAM | — |
Main Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Gravity Q T289 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 320p@15fps | Yes |
| Features | — | Panorama |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 2 MP | 2 MP |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Gravity Q T289 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 1200 | 1000 |
| Chemistry | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| stand by | Up to 300 h | Up to 360 h |
| talk time | Up to 6 h | Up to 5 h |
Body
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Gravity Q T289 |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Single SIM (Micro-SIM) or Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Mini-SIM |
| Height (mm) | 105 | 112.5 |
| keyboard | — | QWERTY |
| Thickness (mm) | 11.8 | 14.2 |
| Weight (g) | 100.5 | 118.8 |
| Width (mm) | 57.8 | 59.7 |
Launch
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Gravity Q T289 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2013, April. Released 2013, June | 2013, July. Released 2013, July |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Gravity Q T289 |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 - S5310 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 900, 2100 | HSDPA 850, 1700, 1900, 2100 |
| Speed | HSPA 7.2/5.76 Mbps | HSPA |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA | GSM, HSPA |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Gravity Q T289 |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4 | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | No |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB Version | 2.0 | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | — |
Sound
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Gravity Q T289 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Gravity Q T289 |
|---|---|---|
| games | — | Yes |
| java | — | Yes |
| messaging | — | SMS(threaded view), MMS, Email |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, compass | Accelerometer |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 and Samsung Gravity Q T289 are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 packs a 1200 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Other popular comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple