Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 vs Samsung Rex 80 S5222R
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.
Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310
Price coming soon
Samsung Rex 80 S5222R
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Samsung Rex 80 S5222R
Better display
Even
Lighter body
Even
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Rex 80 S5222R |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 3 | 3 |
| Resolution Height | 320 | 320 |
| Resolution Width | 240 | 240 |
| PPI | 133 | 133 |
| Screen-to-body | 45.9 | 47.1 |
Platform
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Rex 80 S5222R |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 850 MHz | — |
| OS Name | Android | — |
| OS Version | 4.1.2 | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Rex 80 S5222R |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| call records | — | Yes |
| phonebook | — | 1000 entries |
| Variants | 4GB 0.5GB RAM | 0.01953125GB |
Main Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Rex 80 S5222R |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 320p@15fps | Yes |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 2 MP | 3.15 MP |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Rex 80 S5222R |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 1200 | 1000 |
| Chemistry | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| stand by | Up to 300 h | — |
| talk time | Up to 6 h | Up to 14 h 10 min |
Body
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Rex 80 S5222R |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Single SIM (Micro-SIM) or Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM) |
| Height (mm) | 105 | 102 |
| Thickness (mm) | 11.8 | 11.5 |
| Weight (g) | 100.5 | — |
| Width (mm) | 57.8 | 58 |
Launch
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Rex 80 S5222R |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2013, April. Released 2013, June | 2013, February. Released 2013, March |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Rex 80 S5222R |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 - S5310 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 900, 2100 | — |
| edge | — | Yes |
| gprs | — | Yes |
| Speed | HSPA 7.2/5.76 Mbps | — |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA | GSM |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Rex 80 S5222R |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4 | 3 |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | No |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio, recording |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Rex 80 S5222R |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Rex 80 S5222R |
|---|---|---|
| games | — | Yes |
| java | — | Yes |
| messaging | — | SMS, MMS, Email, IM |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, compass | Proximity |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 and Samsung Rex 80 S5222R are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 packs a 1200 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Samsung Rex 80 S5222R reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 3.15 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple