- Home
- Compare Phones
- Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 vs Samsung Star 3 s5220
Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 vs Samsung Star 3 s5220
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.

Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310
Price coming soon

Samsung Star 3 s5220
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Samsung Star 3 s5220
Better display
Even
Lighter body
Samsung Star 3 s5220
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Star 3 s5220 |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 3 | 3 |
| Resolution Height | 320 | 320 |
| Resolution Width | 240 | 240 |
| PPI | 133 | 133 |
| Screen-to-body | 45.9 | 47.1 |
Platform
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Star 3 s5220 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 850 MHz | — |
| OS Name | Android | — |
| OS Version | 4.1.2 | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Star 3 s5220 |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| call records | — | Yes |
| phonebook | — | Yes, Photocall |
| Variants | 4GB 0.5GB RAM | 0.01953125GB |
Main Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Star 3 s5220 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 320p@15fps | QCIF@15fps |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 2 MP | 3.15 MP |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Star 3 s5220 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 1200 | 1000 |
| Chemistry | Li-Ion | — |
| stand by | Up to 300 h | Up to 625 h |
| talk time | Up to 6 h | Up to 14 h 40 min |
Body
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Star 3 s5220 |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Single SIM (Micro-SIM) or Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Mini-SIM |
| Height (mm) | 105 | 102 |
| Thickness (mm) | 11.8 | 11.5 |
| Weight (g) | 100.5 | 95 |
| Width (mm) | 57.8 | 58 |
Launch
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Star 3 s5220 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2013, April. Released 2013, June | 2012, January. Released 2012, April |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Star 3 s5220 |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 - S5310 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 900, 2100 | — |
| edge | — | Class 12 |
| gprs | — | Yes |
| Speed | HSPA 7.2/5.76 Mbps | — |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA | GSM |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Star 3 s5220 |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4 | 3 |
| NFC | No | — |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | No |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording | Stereo FM radio, RDS |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Star 3 s5220 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 | Samsung Star 3 s5220 |
|---|---|---|
| games | — | Yes + downloadable |
| java | — | Yes, MIDP 2.0 |
| messaging | — | SMS(threaded view), MMS, Email, Push Email, IM |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, compass | Accelerometer |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 and Samsung Star 3 s5220 are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310 packs a 1200 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Samsung Star 3 s5220 reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 3.15 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi


Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple