- Home
- Compare Phones
- Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300
Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.

Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957
Price coming soon

Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Even
Better display
Even
Lighter body
Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957 | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Panel Type | PLS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Resolution Height | 1280 | 1280 |
| Resolution Width | 800 | 800 |
| PPI | 170 | 170 |
| Screen-to-body | 63 | 63 |
Platform
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957 | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Dual-core 1.5 GHz | Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A9 |
| GPU | — | ULP GeForce |
| Chipset Name | — | Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 3.2 | 3.0 |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957 | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 16GB 1GB RAM, 32GB 1GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM, 32GB 1GB RAM, 64GB 1GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957 | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 720p | 720p |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 3.15 MP | 3.15 MP |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957 | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 2 MP | 2 MP |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957 | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 6100 | 6000 |
| stand by | Up to 400 h | — |
| talk time | Up to 11 h | — |
Body
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957 | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300 |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Height (mm) | 230.9 | 230.9 |
| Thickness (mm) | 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Weight (g) | 455 | 453 |
| Width (mm) | 157.8 | 157.8 |
Launch
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957 | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2011, August. Released 2011, November | 2011, March. Released 2011, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957 | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300 |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, 1900, 2100 - for AT&T | HSDPA 850, 900, 1900, 2100 |
| 4G Bands | 4, 17 - AT&T | — |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957 | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 3 | 3 |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Radio | No | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957 | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
Features
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957 | Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300 |
|---|---|---|
| browser | — | HTML, Adobe Flash |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, compass |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957 and Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 P7300 are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE I957 packs a 6100 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Other popular comparisons


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi


Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple