Sharp Aquos C10 vs Sharp R1S
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.
Sharp Aquos C10
Price coming soon
Sharp R1S
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Sharp R1S
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Sharp R1S
Better display
Sharp Aquos C10
Lighter body
Even
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Sharp Aquos C10 | Sharp R1S |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Panel Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution Height | 2040 | 1280 |
| Resolution Width | 1080 | 720 |
| PPI | 420 | 267 |
| Glass Type | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | — |
| Screen-to-body | 79 | — |
Platform
| Spec | Sharp Aquos C10 | Sharp R1S |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex A53) | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| GPU | Adreno 508 | Mali-T860MP2 |
| Chipset Name | Snapdragon 630 | Mediatek MT6750 |
| Process (nm) | 14 | 28 |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 8.0 | 7.0 |
Memory
| Spec | Sharp Aquos C10 | Sharp R1S |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Variants | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | Sharp Aquos C10 | Sharp R1S |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Count | 2 | 2 |
| Depth | — | 5 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Lens | 8 MP, f/2 | 13 MP, f/2 |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | Sharp Aquos C10 | Sharp R1S |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 1080p@30fps | — |
| Features | 1080p@30fps | — |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 8 MP, f/2 | 5 MP, f/2.4 |
Battery
| Spec | Sharp Aquos C10 | Sharp R1S |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 2700 | 5000 |
| Chemistry | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wired Charging (W) | 18 | — |
Body
| Spec | Sharp Aquos C10 | Sharp R1S |
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), glass back, aluminum frame | — |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Height (mm) | 141.8 | — |
| Thickness (mm) | 7.9 | — |
| Weight (g) | 140 | — |
| Width (mm) | 72 | — |
Launch
| Spec | Sharp Aquos C10 | Sharp R1S |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, July. Released 2018, July | 2018, February. Released 2018, March |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Sharp Aquos C10 | Sharp R1S |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, 900, 1900, 2100 | HSDPA 850, 900, 1900, 2100 |
| 4G Bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE |
Connectivity
| Spec | Sharp Aquos C10 | Sharp R1S |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB Type | Type-C | — |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Sharp Aquos C10 | Sharp R1S |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Sharp Aquos C10 | Sharp R1S |
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Sharp Aquos C10 and Sharp R1S are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Sharp R1S packs a 5000 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Sharp R1S reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 13 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple