- Home
- Compare Phones
- Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro vs Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359)
Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro vs Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359)
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.

Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro
Price coming soon

Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359)
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359)
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359)
Better display
Even
Lighter body
Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro | Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Resolution Height | 480 | 480 |
| Resolution Width | 320 | 320 |
| PPI | 165 | 165 |
| Screen-to-body | 51.6 | 49.4 |
Platform
| Spec | Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro | Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | — | Dual-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| GPU | — | Mali-400 |
| Chipset Name | — | Mediatek MT6571 |
| Process (nm) | — | 28 |
| OS Name | — | Android |
| OS Version | — | 4.4.2 |
Memory
| Spec | Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro | Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC |
| call records | Yes | — |
| phonebook | 500 entries | — |
| Variants | — | 0.5GB 0.25GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro | Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) |
|---|---|---|
| Video | Yes | 720p@25fps |
| Features | — | LED flash |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 1.3 MP | 2 MP |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro | Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) |
|---|---|---|
| Count | — | 1 |
| Lens | — | 1.3 MP |
Battery
| Spec | Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro | Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 1000 | 1400 |
| Chemistry | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| music play | — | Up to 20 h |
| stand by | Up to 200 h | Up to 280 h |
| talk time | Up to 3 h 30 min | Up to 6 h |
Body
| Spec | Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro | Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM) | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM) |
| Height (mm) | 114 | 117.5 |
| Thickness (mm) | 13.6 | 12 |
| Weight (g) | 70 | 130 |
| Width (mm) | 62 | 62.9 |
Launch
| Spec | Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro | Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2012, August. Released 2012, August | 2014, August. Released 2014, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro | Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 900, 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 900, 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| edge | No | Class 12 |
| gprs | Yes | Class 12 |
| Technology | GSM | GSM |
Connectivity
| Spec | Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro | Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | — | 3 |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB Version | — | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro | Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | — | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro | Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) |
|---|---|---|
| games | Downloadable | — |
| java | Yes | — |
| messaging | Yes | — |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Spice M-5900 Flo TV Pro and Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) packs a 1400 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 2 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi


Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple