- Home
- Compare Phones
- T-Mobile G-Slate vs T-Mobile REVVL Tab
T-Mobile G-Slate vs T-Mobile REVVL Tab
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.

T-Mobile G-Slate
Price coming soon

T-Mobile REVVL Tab
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Even
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
T-Mobile REVVL Tab
Better display
T-Mobile REVVL Tab
Lighter body
T-Mobile REVVL Tab
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | T-Mobile G-Slate | T-Mobile REVVL Tab |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 8.9 | 10.36 |
| Panel Type | LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution Height | 1280 | 2000 |
| Resolution Width | 768 | 1200 |
| PPI | 168 | 225 |
| Screen-to-body | 61.7 | 78.5 |
Platform
| Spec | T-Mobile G-Slate | T-Mobile REVVL Tab |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A9 | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | ULP GeForce | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Chipset Name | Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 | Mediatek Dimensity 700 |
| Process (nm) | — | 7 |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 3.0 | 13 |
Memory
| Spec | T-Mobile G-Slate | T-Mobile REVVL Tab |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Variants | 32GB | 128GB 6GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | T-Mobile G-Slate | T-Mobile REVVL Tab |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 1080p@24fps (2D), 720@30fps (3D) | 1080p@30fps |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Count | 2 | 2 |
| Depth | — | 2 MP, (depth) |
| Lens | 5 MP | — |
| Wide | — | 8 MP, (wide) |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | T-Mobile G-Slate | T-Mobile REVVL Tab |
|---|---|---|
| Video | — | 1080p@30fps |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 2 MP | 8 MP |
Battery
| Spec | T-Mobile G-Slate | T-Mobile REVVL Tab |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | — | 7040 |
| Chemistry | — | Li-Po |
| stand by | Up to 273 h | — |
| talk time | Up to 9 h 20 min | — |
| Wired Charging (W) | — | 15 |
Body
| Spec | T-Mobile G-Slate | T-Mobile REVVL Tab |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Height (mm) | 243.8 | 247.6 |
| Thickness (mm) | 12.7 | 7.9 |
| Weight (g) | 621 | 513.1 |
| Width (mm) | 150 | 157.1 |
Launch
| Spec | T-Mobile G-Slate | T-Mobile REVVL Tab |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2011, February. Released 2011, April | 2023, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, August 24 |
Network
| Spec | T-Mobile G-Slate | T-Mobile REVVL Tab |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 1700, 2100 | HSDPA 850, 900, 1700(AWS), 1900, 2100 |
| 4G Bands | — | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G Bands | — | 1, 3, 7, 25, 28, 38, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 10.2/2 Mbps | HSPA, LTE (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA | GSM, HSPA, LTE, 5G |
Connectivity
| Spec | T-Mobile G-Slate | T-Mobile REVVL Tab |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | — | No |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB Type | — | Type-C |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
Sound
| Spec | T-Mobile G-Slate | T-Mobile REVVL Tab |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
Features
| Spec | T-Mobile G-Slate | T-Mobile REVVL Tab |
|---|---|---|
| browser | HTML, Adobe Flash | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both T-Mobile G-Slate and T-Mobile REVVL Tab are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
T-Mobile REVVL Tab reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 8 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi


Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple