vivo X300s vs vivo X70 Pro+
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.
vivo X300s
Price coming soon
4category wins
vivo X70 Pro+
Price coming soon
2category wins
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
vivo X300s
Bigger battery
vivo X300s
Faster charging
vivo X300s
Higher-resolution camera
vivo X300s
Better display
vivo X70 Pro+
Lighter body
vivo X70 Pro+
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | vivo X300s | vivo X70 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 6.78 | 6.78 |
| Panel Type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution Height | 2800 | 3200 |
| Resolution Width | 1260 | 1440 |
| Refresh Rate | 144 | 120 |
| Peak Brightness | — | 1500 |
| PPI | 452 | 517 |
| Glass Type | Reinforced Glass | — |
| Screen-to-body | 91.1 | 90.1 |
| Other | Ultra HDR image support | — |
Platform
| Spec | vivo X300s | vivo X70 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Adreno 660 |
| Chipset Name | Dimensity 9500 | Snapdragon 888 + 5G |
| Process (nm) | 3 | 5 |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| UI Skin | OriginOS 6 | Funtouch OS 14 |
| OS Version | 16 | 11 |
Benchmarks
Geekbench (Single-Core)
vivo X300s +109%Geekbench (Multi-Core)
vivo X300s +160%AnTuTu
vivo X300s +211%| Spec | vivo X300s | vivo X70 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench (Single-Core) | 3,352 | 1,605 |
| Geekbench (Multi-Core) | 10,402 | 3,996 |
| AnTuTu | 3,760,662 | 1,208,784 |
Memory
| Spec | vivo X300s | vivo X70 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Other | UFS 4.1 | — |
| Variants | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | vivo X300s | vivo X70 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 4K@120fps HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10 + |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Count | 3 | 4 |
| periscope telephoto | 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm, (periscope telephoto) | 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm, (periscope telephoto) |
| Telephoto | — | 12 MP, f/1.6, 50mm, (telephoto) |
| ultrawide | 50 MP, f/2, 15mm, (ultrawide) | 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, (ultrawide) |
| Wide | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm, (wide) | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide) |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | vivo X300s | vivo X70 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 50 MP, f/2, 20mm, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm, (wide) |
Battery
| Spec | vivo X300s | vivo X70 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 7100 | 4500 |
| Chemistry | Si/C Li-Ion | — |
| Wired Charging (W) | 90 | 55 |
| Wireless Charging (W) | 40 | 50 |
Body
| Spec | vivo X300s | vivo X70 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - International / Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Height (mm) | 162 | 164.5 |
| Thickness (mm) | 8 | 8.9 |
| Other | IP68/IP69 dust tight and water resistant (high pressure water jets; immersible up to 1.5m for 30 min) | — |
| Weight (g) | 217 | 209 |
| Width (mm) | 75.5 | 75.2 |
Launch
| Spec | vivo X300s | vivo X70 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026, March 30 | 2021, September 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2026, April 03 | Available. Released 2021, September 17 |
Network
| Spec | vivo X300s | vivo X70 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850, 900, 1700(AWS), 1900, 2100 |
| 4G Bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G Bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA, LTE, 5G | GSM, CDMA, HSPA, EVDO, LTE, 5G |
Connectivity
| Spec | vivo X300s | vivo X70 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1 + L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB Type | Type-C | Type-C |
| USB Version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
Sound
| Spec | vivo X300s | vivo X70 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
Features
| Spec | vivo X300s | vivo X70 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both vivo X300s and vivo X70 Pro+ are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
vivo X300s packs a 7100 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
vivo X300s posts a stronger benchmark score, useful for heavier games and multitasking on Algerian carriers' busier 4G networks.
vivo X300s reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 200 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple